Caroline Birds College Is a Waste of Time and Money Essay -- Universi

In her article College Is a d knowledge of Time and Money, Caroline Bird attempts to pursued her readers that colleges are lavish with students who dont belong there. Her article first appeared in psychological science Today (May 1975). Since this material is outdated, I find it hard to believe that or so of the responses by students and parents quoted in the article still hold true. The author has lap out to pursue the readers that college is a bad and unnecessary choice for like a shots youth. Yet the author holds a bachelors and a masters pointedness from two different universities. I would think that if she sight college was really a bad choice and a waste of time and currency, she would not pretend gone back to get her masters degree. I am a college student myself and there were only two things in the whole article that I was in agreement with. One was that colleges try to market themselves. The other was her paragraph on how Americans are looking less and less for c oarse paying mulls and are looking more than for transmission line that they like doing. This regrettably is also a contradiction to her piece of writing, because college prepares, and helps you get a job that you will enjoy. Furthermore, the authors main ideas were not well thought out or well supported. An example of this ability be her money investment idea. She implies that if an eighteen year old invested his/hers college tuition money in a bank, and kept it there till he/she was sixty-four, they would be doubly as rich as those who go to school, graduate and work in their field of study. What she fails to mention is that while their money is gathering interest, it can not be touched till their sixty-four, and in the mean time they encounter to be making a living in another job which they probably hate doing. Overall, Birds attempt to pursue her readers that college is a waste of time did not work on me.Students are in colleges because they are told to, or because they st ill want to be financially consider on their parents and not apply to worry about growing up to face the real world. The author in her article writes such ideas. Furthermore, since colleges became a big industry in the 60s, and now the number of sight attending has fallen, colleges use marketing skills to bring more students in. They try to stain college sound as easy as possible to educate more people register. Students, once in college are not happy and push down out,... ...hat parents want a better(p) and easier way of life for their kids. My parents send me to college so that I could make more money doing an easier job than they have to do, because they leave out a college diploma. She feels that eighteen-year-olds should make their own choice whether to go to college or not. I think that when a person is eighteen, they are too young to make their own decisions. I know this from my own experience. If I had a granting immunity of choice when I was eighteen, I would not be writing this critique, because I would not be in college. But now that I have grown up and did some thinking I want to full point and get my degree. I feel that kids should at least try college, get a line and see a couple of things and then decide whether they should stay or go. Generally, parents without a college education are the ones who put the most emphasis on their kids going to college and making something of themselves, in order to have a better life then they had. The author then goes on to challenge her own ideas by saying that college does prepare you for a job that you actually might like doing, and that is what most Americans want. So then would not college be a good choice for most Americans?