This definition -as its name suggests- consists of three parts and is evince nonwithstanding on : S knows that P IFF (i) P is true (ii) S believes that P, and (iii) S is justified in believing that P in that location are umpteen problems that arise from this definition. First of all, the definition is qualified to cases that concern learned that. It does not apply in cases where know how (e.g. knowing how to drive) or knowing someth ing (e.g. knowing Greek) are concerned. In a! ddition as far as conditions (i) and (ii) are concerned, it is not always incumbent for knowing P that either S believes that P or that P is true. There are cases where these conditions are in truth not necessary for S to know that P. Finally, the main problem that arises in this definition has to do with whether all three conditions are actually sufficient for knowing that P is true. Gettier was the first to focus on this part of the problem of...If you indirect request to get a skillful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment